Editor · court-ready drafts

Write it once. File it as the court wants.

A legal editor that knows the cause-title, lays the page out for the Supreme Court or your High Court, and checks your draft against the judgments it cites before you export.

Start drafting Book a demo

Court layouts: applied automatically
Check before filing: claims vs. judgments
Word & PDF: export or print

Reply to notice — Sharma v. StateHigh Court layoutSaved

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

CRL.M.C. 3120/2026

1. That the Petitioner was arrested on 11 August 2026 without any reasons being recorded under Section 41 CrPC.

2. That the arrest is contrary to the law laid down in Arnesh Kumar v. State of Bihar,

✓ (2014) 8 SCC 273 verifiedTab to accept

EditorStart drafting

Write with Nyra

Select a line. Make it better.

Select any text and Nyra rewrites, tightens or translates it in place. As you type, it suggests the next words in faded text — press Tab to keep them.

Try the buttons on the page.

4. That it is most respectfully submitted that the impugned order has been passed without taking into consideration the various facts and circumstances which were placed before the Ld. Trial Court at the relevant time.

Inserted

Jurisdiction. The courts at New Delhi shall have exclusive jurisdiction over all disputes arising out of or in connection with this Agreement.

Slash commands

Type / for the legal parts.

Clauses from your firm’s library, statutory sections, footnotes, a table of contents or a table — without leaving the keyboard.

Court layout

The page sets itself for the court.

The editor reads the cause-title — “IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA” — and applies that court’s margins and type, on screen and in the exported file. No ribbon to fiddle with.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

CRL.M.C. 3120/2026

Petition under Section 528 BNSS seeking quashing of FIR No. 211/2026, P.S. Saket.

High Court layoutdetected from cause-title

Check before filing

Caught before the bench catches it.

When you export, the editor flags statements the cited judgments don’t bear out — and any blanks still empty. It never blocks you; it just makes sure you’ve looked.

Rejoinder — Bharat Textiles v. Commr of GST

6. The Hon’ble Supreme Court has held that input tax credit cannot be denied for a supplier’s default in every case.

7. The same judgment holds that interest under Section 50 is never payable on such credit.

8. The appellant’s GSTIN is [GSTIN].

3. The petitioner seeks stay quashing of the order dated 11 August 2026.

Anjali · “quashing” is right — we’re under S.528, not seeking a stay.

Review

Every version kept. Every comment in place.

The draft saves as you write. Go back to any version, see what changed, and leave comments on the exact line for your junior to fix.